Friday, March 15, 2013
Friday, March 8, 2013
naysayer
I know I run the risk of just sounding like I'm perpetually sour and pissy about everything, and while there is a hair of truth to that I think a more accurate assessment is that I'm just skeptical and a bit of a luddite. Latest case in point: "Volvo has announced it is releasing a cyclist detection facility which should prevent fatal accidents."
Great! I don't need to worry about those pesky cyclists anymore because my car will do all of the work for me! It's amazing that I have to take less responsibility on the road now! Yes, I get it. Any innovation that pushes for safer roads is good. Less people getting hit by cars is a good thing. And even the most attentive driver and the most attentive responsible pedestrian can still get in an accident that this system could maybe avoid. Super, whatever, we can agree on that.
However, I think it's insane that this is what someone sat down and saw as the most logical step to preventing accidents and fatalities. Volvo knows that the best way to avoid hitting a cyclist is simply to encourage drivers to drive less and when you do drive be responsible, courteous, and careful. But driving less and being responsible are not sexy and they do not sell cars. Computers in every nook and cranny of a cars cockpit is sexy. It means you can be footloose and fancy free when you are behind the wheel of a Volvo because, hell, even if you aren't paying attention your car will do the work for you.
The idea that the average motorist needs to be more disconnected from the road and their environment is deranged. But stepping back and saying "Hey Volvo developer people, maybe instead of investing a ton of R&D on some spaceage car driving shit we should just, you know, like encourage people to drive less and be safer about it when they do drive." Setting a precedent for increased driver negligence is just a total bummer. I was glad to see that people in Britain are just as fussy about the thing as I am, but alas I fear that those pleas fall on deaf ears. Ride safe, ride smart, cars are robots that are no longer liable for hitting you.
Happy Friday!
Great! I don't need to worry about those pesky cyclists anymore because my car will do all of the work for me! It's amazing that I have to take less responsibility on the road now! Yes, I get it. Any innovation that pushes for safer roads is good. Less people getting hit by cars is a good thing. And even the most attentive driver and the most attentive responsible pedestrian can still get in an accident that this system could maybe avoid. Super, whatever, we can agree on that.
However, I think it's insane that this is what someone sat down and saw as the most logical step to preventing accidents and fatalities. Volvo knows that the best way to avoid hitting a cyclist is simply to encourage drivers to drive less and when you do drive be responsible, courteous, and careful. But driving less and being responsible are not sexy and they do not sell cars. Computers in every nook and cranny of a cars cockpit is sexy. It means you can be footloose and fancy free when you are behind the wheel of a Volvo because, hell, even if you aren't paying attention your car will do the work for you.
The idea that the average motorist needs to be more disconnected from the road and their environment is deranged. But stepping back and saying "Hey Volvo developer people, maybe instead of investing a ton of R&D on some spaceage car driving shit we should just, you know, like encourage people to drive less and be safer about it when they do drive." Setting a precedent for increased driver negligence is just a total bummer. I was glad to see that people in Britain are just as fussy about the thing as I am, but alas I fear that those pleas fall on deaf ears. Ride safe, ride smart, cars are robots that are no longer liable for hitting you.
Happy Friday!
Ritchey's the man
I'm pretty much lifting this entirely from AHTBM but it's worth the watch. It's encouraging to hear big names in the industry talk intelligently about making stuff that doesn't suck. Hat's off.
Thursday, February 21, 2013
indicia
It's hard to believe that it's to the point in the year when you have to start planning spring bike stuff. While this causes an undo amount of stress trying to figure out exactly what I will be doing on any given weekend months in advance it’s also nice to think that maybe winter is actually coming to an end and in a few short months I will be sleeping outside and riding my bike without a shirt on. So what’s on the docket?
A million long gravel grinders- I've mentioned in the past that I was admittedly very skeptical of the idea of gravel road rides as just another over-hyped excuse for people to buy another bike and show off what a hard ass they are. My opinion has changed dramatically though. And this year I’m pretty stoked to be partaking in a few events and proving exactly how much of a wimp ass can show up to these things.
SSUSA- I no longer ride a SS mountain bike and I’m going to be gone during this event anyway, but it looks fun, and a lot of people seem to have a pretty big hard-on for this event so it’s worth mentioning. This will probably be full by the time you read this anyway.
Bikepacking and camping every weekend possible- Last year we went bike camping in mid-March when it was something like 70 degrees for a week. Now I doubt this will be happening this year (for good reason, it’s not supposed to.) I’m in the process of putting together a new bike and I’m excited for taking off in a different direction every weekend possible.
Whoa, that's a big block of text. Let's break it up with a picture of the newest offering from Fyxation "The Quiver."
I'm a big fan bikes like this coming into vogue. Highly versatile steel frames that are simply designed and don't cost a ton of money. It always blows me away that this is the same thing that was made for decades and then cast aside for so long before demand for this type of frame came back. While I think that name "Quiver" is horrendous it's neat none the less. Read more here.
And lastly on the topic of silly names and simplicity Jeff from All-City recently made a blog post about why All-City doesn't put model names on their bikes. While I think flashy paint jobs can look alright on some bikes they have never graced my rides and probably never will for many of the reasons highlighted. Well said.
And with that chapter written I am out of here, I got stuff to do.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Spacebook
My brand manager told me all the kids on the street are all about facebook and if I ever want to make it to the big leagues I had better nut up and join. I couldn't resist that face so I did and now you can like this crap on facebook here. First 100 likes get a subtle but comforting head nod meant just for them. Go forth and prosper.
Strada Fango
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






